1955 DKW Universal vs. 2000 Lotus M250
To start off, 2000 Lotus M250 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 DKW Universal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 DKW Universal would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Lotus M250 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 DKW Universal weights approximately 250 kg more than 2000 Lotus M250.
Because 2000 Lotus M250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Lotus M250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1955 DKW Universal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 DKW Universal | 2000 Lotus M250 | |
Make | DKW | Lotus |
Model | Universal | M250 |
Year Released | 1955 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 896 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 176 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 675 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2520 mm |