1955 DKW Universal vs. 2002 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJ is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 DKW Universal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 DKW Universal would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 875 kg more than 1955 DKW Universal.
Because 2002 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1955 DKW Universal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 1955 DKW Universal has manual transmission. 1955 DKW Universal will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 DKW Universal | 2002 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | DKW | Jaguar |
| Model | Universal | XJ |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 896 cc | 4196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 301 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1800 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3040 mm |
