1955 DKW Universal vs. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 DKW Universal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 DKW Universal would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1515 kg more than 1955 DKW Universal.
Because 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 DKW Universal. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 1955 DKW Universal has manual transmission. 1955 DKW Universal will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 DKW Universal | 2002 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | DKW | Land Rover |
| Model | Universal | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 896 cc | 2926 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 175 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 2440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 2200 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2800 mm |
