1955 DKW Universal vs. 2006 Ford E-250
To start off, 2006 Ford E-250 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 DKW Universal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 DKW Universal would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford E-250 weights approximately 295 kg more than 1955 DKW Universal.
Because 2006 Ford E-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford E-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1955 DKW Universal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 DKW Universal | 2006 Ford E-250 | |
Make | DKW | Ford |
Model | Universal | E-250 |
Year Released | 1955 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 896 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 226 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 5900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 2140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3510 mm |