1955 DKW Universal vs. 2009 Ford E-350
To start off, 2009 Ford E-350 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 DKW Universal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 DKW Universal would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford E-350 weights approximately 41 kg more than 1955 DKW Universal.
Because 2009 Ford E-350 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford E-350. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1955 DKW Universal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Ford E-350 has automatic transmission and 1955 DKW Universal has manual transmission. 1955 DKW Universal will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Ford E-350 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 DKW Universal | 2009 Ford E-350 | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | Universal | E-350 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 896 cc | 5408 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 255 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 5900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 2140 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3510 mm |
