1955 DKW Universal vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 DKW Universal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 DKW Universal would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 404 kg more than 1955 DKW Universal.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1955 DKW Universal has manual transmission. 1955 DKW Universal will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 DKW Universal | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | DKW | Mazda |
| Model | Universal | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 896 cc | 3726 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 273 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1329 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2880 mm |
