1955 Fairthorpe Atom vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1966 Triumph 2000 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Fairthorpe Atom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Fairthorpe Atom would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Triumph 2000 (91 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1955 Fairthorpe Atom. (35 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1955 Fairthorpe Atom. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 739 kg more than 1955 Fairthorpe Atom. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Fairthorpe Atom. (49 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1966 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Fairthorpe Atom.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Fairthorpe Atom | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Fairthorpe | Triumph |
Model | Atom | 2000 |
Year Released | 1955 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 646 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 49 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 431 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 20 L | 64 L |