1955 Fairthorpe Atom vs. 1968 Pontiac GTO
To start off, 1968 Pontiac GTO is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Fairthorpe Atom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Fairthorpe Atom would be higher. At 6,549 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Pontiac GTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Pontiac GTO (365 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 350 more horse power than 1955 Fairthorpe Atom. (15 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Pontiac GTO should accelerate faster than 1955 Fairthorpe Atom.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Fairthorpe Atom | 1968 Pontiac GTO | |
| Make | Fairthorpe | Pontiac |
| Model | Atom | GTO |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 322 cc | 6549 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 15 HP | 365 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 60 mm | 104.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 57 mm | 95.3 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 6.1:1 | 10.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2850 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 20 L | 69 L |
