1955 Fairthorpe Atom vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Fairthorpe Atom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Fairthorpe Atom would be higher. At 599 cc (3 cylinders), 2005 MCC Crossblade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 55 more horse power than 1955 Fairthorpe Atom. (15 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1955 Fairthorpe Atom. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 MCC Crossblade weights approximately 327 kg more than 1955 Fairthorpe Atom. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Fairthorpe Atom | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Fairthorpe | MCC |
| Model | Atom | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 322 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 15 HP | 70 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 417 kg | 744 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 1810 mm |
