1955 Fairthorpe Atom vs. 2011 Renault Clio
To start off, 2011 Renault Clio is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Fairthorpe Atom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Fairthorpe Atom would be higher. At 1,149 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Renault Clio (60 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1955 Fairthorpe Atom. (15 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1955 Fairthorpe Atom.
Because 1955 Fairthorpe Atom is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Fairthorpe Atom. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Fairthorpe Atom | 2011 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Fairthorpe | Renault |
| Model | Atom | Clio |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 322 cc | 1149 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 15 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 60 mm | 69 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 57 mm | 76.8 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 20 L | 50 L |
