1955 Fiat 1400 vs. 1963 Morris Oxford
To start off, 1963 Morris Oxford is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Fiat 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Fiat 1400 would be higher. At 1,622 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Morris Oxford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Morris Oxford (60 HP) has 11 more horse power than 1955 Fiat 1400. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Morris Oxford should accelerate faster than 1955 Fiat 1400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Morris Oxford weights approximately 5 kg more than 1955 Fiat 1400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Fiat 1400 | 1963 Morris Oxford | |
Make | Fiat | Morris |
Model | 1400 | Oxford |
Year Released | 1955 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1395 cc | 1622 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 60 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 1130 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 45 L |