1955 Fiat 1400 vs. 1963 Rover 2000
To start off, 1963 Rover 2000 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Fiat 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Fiat 1400 would be higher. At 1,978 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Rover 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Rover 2000 (91 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1955 Fiat 1400. (49 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Rover 2000 should accelerate faster than 1955 Fiat 1400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Rover 2000 weights approximately 87 kg more than 1955 Fiat 1400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Fiat 1400 | 1963 Rover 2000 | |
Make | Fiat | Rover |
Model | 1400 | 2000 |
Year Released | 1955 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1395 cc | 1978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 1212 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 54 L |