1955 Fiat 1400 vs. 1983 Lotus Excel
To start off, 1983 Lotus Excel is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Fiat 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Fiat 1400 would be higher. At 2,174 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Lotus Excel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Lotus Excel (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1955 Fiat 1400. (49 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Lotus Excel should accelerate faster than 1955 Fiat 1400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Lotus Excel weights approximately 10 kg more than 1955 Fiat 1400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Fiat 1400 | 1983 Lotus Excel | |
Make | Fiat | Lotus |
Model | 1400 | Excel |
Year Released | 1955 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1395 cc | 2174 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 1135 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1020 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 31 L |