1955 Fiat 1400 vs. 2002 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2002 Toyota Tundra is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Fiat 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Fiat 1400 would be higher. At 4,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 196 more horse power than 1955 Fiat 1400. (49 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1955 Fiat 1400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Fiat 1400 weights approximately 202 kg more than 2002 Toyota Tundra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Toyota Tundra has automatic transmission and 1955 Fiat 1400 has manual transmission. 1955 Fiat 1400 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Toyota Tundra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Fiat 1400 | 2002 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Fiat | Toyota |
Model | 1400 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1955 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1395 cc | 4698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 923 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 70 L |