1955 Fiat 1400 vs. 2010 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Fiat 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Fiat 1400 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1955 Fiat 1400. (49 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1955 Fiat 1400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Fiat 1400 weights approximately 170 kg more than 2010 Mazda BT-50.
Because 2010 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Fiat 1400. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Fiat 1400 | 2010 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Fiat | Mazda |
Model | 1400 | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1955 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1395 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 955 kg |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 50 L |