1955 Fiat 1900 vs. 1980 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1980 Mercury Cougar is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Fiat 1900. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Fiat 1900 would be higher. At 3,271 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Mercury Cougar (97 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1955 Fiat 1900. (79 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1955 Fiat 1900. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 100 kg more than 1955 Fiat 1900. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Fiat 1900 | 1980 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Fiat | Mercury |
Model | 1900 | Cougar |
Year Released | 1955 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1901 cc | 3271 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2690 mm |