1955 Fiat 1900 vs. 2003 Ford Ka
To start off, 2003 Ford Ka is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Fiat 1900. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Fiat 1900 would be higher. At 1,901 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Fiat 1900 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Fiat 1900 (79 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ka. (69 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Fiat 1900 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Fiat 1900 weights approximately 268 kg more than 2003 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Fiat 1900 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Fiat 1900. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Fiat 1900 | 2003 Ford Ka | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | 1900 | Ka |
Year Released | 1955 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1901 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 69 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 962 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2450 mm |