1955 Fiat Campagnola vs. 1992 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1992 Ford Falcon is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Falcon (198 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1955 Fiat Campagnola. (39 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1955 Fiat Campagnola.
Because 1955 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1955 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Falcon (348 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Fiat Campagnola. (144 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Fiat Campagnola.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Fiat Campagnola | 1992 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Campagnola | Falcon |
Year Released | 1955 | 1992 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2054 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 198 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 348 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2800 mm |