1955 Fiat Campagnola vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 2,054 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Fiat Campagnola is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Renault Clio (64 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1955 Fiat Campagnola. (39 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1955 Fiat Campagnola.
Because 1955 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1955 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1955 Fiat Campagnola (144 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Renault Clio. (118 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1955 Fiat Campagnola will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Fiat Campagnola | 1998 Renault Clio | |
Make | Fiat | Renault |
Model | Campagnola | Clio |
Year Released | 1955 | 1998 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2054 cc | 1783 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 21.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2470 mm |