1955 Fiat Campagnola vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 1,901 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Fiat Campagnola is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1955 Fiat Campagnola. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1955 Fiat Campagnola. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Fiat Campagnola weights approximately 550 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Because 1955 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 MCC Crossblade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1955 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1955 Fiat Campagnola (128 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm). This means 1955 Fiat Campagnola will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Fiat Campagnola | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Fiat | MCC |
| Model | Campagnola | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 1901 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 128 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 1810 mm |
