1955 Fiat Campagnola vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 2,054 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Fiat Campagnola is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1955 Fiat Campagnola. (39 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1955 Fiat Campagnola.
Because 1955 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1955 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (240 Nm) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Fiat Campagnola. (144 Nm). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Fiat Campagnola.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Fiat Campagnola | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Fiat | Mazda |
Model | Campagnola | 6 |
Year Released | 1955 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2054 cc | 1594 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2610 mm |