1955 Fiat Campagnola vs. 2006 Ford E-350
To start off, 2006 Ford E-350 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 1955 Fiat Campagnola. (39 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1955 Fiat Campagnola.
Because 1955 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Ford E-350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1955 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-350 (475 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 331 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Fiat Campagnola. (144 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Fiat Campagnola.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Fiat Campagnola | 2006 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Campagnola | E-350 |
Year Released | 1955 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2054 cc | 5407 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 475 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 12 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3510 mm |