1955 Fiat V8 vs. 2000 Ford Artic
To start off, 2000 Ford Artic is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Fiat V8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Fiat V8 would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Artic (128 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1955 Fiat V8. (125 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Artic should accelerate faster than 1955 Fiat V8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Artic weights approximately 158 kg more than 1955 Fiat V8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Ford Artic has automatic transmission and 1955 Fiat V8 has manual transmission. 1955 Fiat V8 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Artic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Fiat V8 | 2000 Ford Artic | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | V8 | Artic |
Year Released | 1955 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 3998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1298 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3200 mm |