1955 Ford 12 M vs. 1964 Renault 4
To start off, 1964 Renault 4 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,172 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Ford 12 M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Ford 12 M (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1964 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Ford 12 M should accelerate faster than 1964 Renault 4.
Because 1955 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Ford 12 M | 1964 Renault 4 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | 12 M | 4 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 747 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2410 mm |
