1955 Ford 12 M vs. 1964 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 1964 Triumph Vitesse is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,594 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Triumph Vitesse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Triumph Vitesse (70 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1955 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Triumph Vitesse should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Ford 12 M | 1964 Triumph Vitesse | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | 12 M | Vitesse |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1594 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2270 mm |
