1955 Ford 12 M vs. 1966 Triumph Spitfire
To start off, 1966 Triumph Spitfire is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,172 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Ford 12 M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Triumph Spitfire (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1955 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Triumph Spitfire should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Ford 12 M | 1966 Triumph Spitfire | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | 12 M | Spitfire |
Year Released | 1955 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1147 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2140 mm |