1955 Ford 12 M vs. 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,410 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste (74 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1955 Ford 12 M. (37 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste has automatic transmission and 1955 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1955 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Ford 12 M | 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 12 M | Celeste |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1410 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 74 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2350 mm |
