1955 Ford 12 M vs. 1982 Opel Ascona
To start off, 1982 Opel Ascona is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Opel Ascona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Opel Ascona (90 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1955 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Opel Ascona should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford 12 M.
Because 1955 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Opel Ascona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Opel Ascona has automatic transmission and 1955 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1955 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Opel Ascona will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Ford 12 M | 1982 Opel Ascona | |
| Make | Ford | Opel |
| Model | 12 M | Ascona |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 90 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2580 mm |
