1955 Ford 12 M vs. 1984 Rover 3500
To start off, 1984 Rover 3500 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 3,532 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Rover 3500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Rover 3500 (187 HP @ 5280 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1955 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Rover 3500 should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1984 Rover 3500 has automatic transmission and 1955 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1955 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1984 Rover 3500 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Ford 12 M | 1984 Rover 3500 | |
| Make | Ford | Rover |
| Model | 12 M | 3500 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 3532 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5280 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2820 mm |
