1955 Ford 12 M vs. 1990 Ford RS 200
To start off, 1990 Ford RS 200 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Ford RS 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford RS 200 (250 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 1955 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford RS 200 should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford 12 M.
Because 1990 Ford RS 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Ford RS 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Ford 12 M | 1990 Ford RS 200 | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | 12 M | RS 200 |
Year Released | 1955 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 250 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2520 mm |