1955 Ford 12 M vs. 1994 Rover 400
To start off, 1994 Rover 400 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Rover 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Rover 400 (88 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1955 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Rover 400 should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford 12 M.
Because 1955 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Rover 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Ford 12 M | 1994 Rover 400 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | 12 M | 400 |
Year Released | 1955 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 88 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2560 mm |