1955 Ford 12 M vs. 1995 Jaguar XJS
To start off, 1995 Jaguar XJS is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 3,980 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Jaguar XJS (222 HP) has 185 more horse power than 1955 Ford 12 M. (37 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Jaguar XJS should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Ford 12 M | 1995 Jaguar XJS | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | 12 M | XJS |
Year Released | 1955 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 3980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 222 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2600 mm |