1955 Ford 12 M vs. 1996 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 1996 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,982 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Toyota 4Runner (123 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1955 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford 12 M.
Because 1996 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Ford 12 M | 1996 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | 12 M | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1955 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1700 mm |