1955 Ford 12 M vs. 1998 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 1998 Jaguar XJR is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 4,000 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Jaguar XJR (370 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 333 more horse power than 1955 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1998 Jaguar XJR has automatic transmission and 1955 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1955 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Jaguar XJR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Ford 12 M | 1998 Jaguar XJR | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | 12 M | XJR |
Year Released | 1955 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 370 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2880 mm |