1955 Ford 12 M vs. 2000 Holden HRT
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1955 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Ford 12 M | 2000 Holden HRT | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | 12 M | HRT |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
