1955 Ford 12 M vs. 2001 Nissan Moco
To start off, 2001 Nissan Moco is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,172 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Ford 12 M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Nissan Moco (53 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1955 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Nissan Moco should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford 12 M.
Because 2001 Nissan Moco is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Nissan Moco will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Nissan Moco has automatic transmission and 1955 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1955 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Nissan Moco will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Ford 12 M | 2001 Nissan Moco | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | 12 M | Moco |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2001 |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 658 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2370 mm |
