1955 Ford 12 M vs. 2003 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2003 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,873 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 SsangYong Rexton (118 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1955 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford 12 M.
Because 2003 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Ford 12 M | 2003 SsangYong Rexton | |
Make | Ford | SsangYong |
Model | 12 M | Rexton |
Year Released | 1955 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2873 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2830 mm |