1955 Ford 12 M vs. 2004 Ford C-MAX
To start off, 2004 Ford C-MAX is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford C-MAX (104 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1955 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford 12 M.
Because 1955 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford C-MAX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Ford 12 M | 2004 Ford C-MAX | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | 12 M | C-MAX |
Year Released | 1955 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2650 mm |