1955 Ford 12 M vs. 2004 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ranger (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1955 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Ford 12 M | 2004 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | 12 M | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3200 mm |
