1955 Ford 12 M vs. 2004 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2004 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 3,933 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Thunderbird (280 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 243 more horse power than 1955 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Ford 12 M | 2004 Ford Thunderbird | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | 12 M | Thunderbird |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 3933 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 280 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2490 mm |
