1955 Ford 12 M vs. 2004 Mazda 6
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (256 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 219 more horse power than 1955 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford 12 M.
Because 2004 Mazda 6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Ford 12 M | 2004 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | 12 M | 6 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 256 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2680 mm |
