1955 Ford 12 M vs. 2004 Renault Scenic II
To start off, 2004 Renault Scenic II is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Renault Scenic II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Renault Scenic II (162 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1955 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Renault Scenic II should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford 12 M.
Because 1955 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Renault Scenic II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Ford 12 M | 2004 Renault Scenic II | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | 12 M | Scenic II |
Year Released | 1955 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 162 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2690 mm |