1955 Ford 12 M vs. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 245 more horse power than 1955 Ford 12 M. (37 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford 12 M.
Because 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Ford 12 M | 2005 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Ford | Land Rover |
Model | 12 M | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1955 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 4392 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 282 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2890 mm |