1955 Ford 12 M vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Space Star
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Space Star is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mitsubishi Space Star is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Space Star (94 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1955 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Space Star should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford 12 M.
Because 1955 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Space Star, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Ford 12 M | 2005 Mitsubishi Space Star | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 12 M | Space Star |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2610 mm |
