1955 Ford 12 M vs. 2006 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 1955 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford 12 M.
Because 1955 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Ford 12 M | 2006 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | 12 M | 6 |
Year Released | 1955 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2966 cc |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2680 mm |