1955 Ford 12 M vs. 2006 Mercury Mariner
To start off, 2006 Mercury Mariner is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mercury Mariner is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Mercury Mariner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mercury Mariner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Mercury Mariner has automatic transmission and 1955 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1955 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mercury Mariner will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Ford 12 M | 2006 Mercury Mariner | |
| Make | Ford | Mercury |
| Model | 12 M | Mariner |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2630 mm |
