1955 Ford 12 M vs. 2008 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (270 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 233 more horse power than 1955 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford 12 M.
Because 2008 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1955 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1955 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Ford 12 M | 2008 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | 12 M | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 3726 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2880 mm |
