1955 Ford 12 M vs. 2009 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2009 Mazda Tribute is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda Tribute (200 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1955 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford 12 M.
Because 2009 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mazda Tribute has automatic transmission and 1955 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1955 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda Tribute will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Ford 12 M | 2009 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | 12 M | Tribute |
Year Released | 1955 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2620 mm |