1955 Ford 12 M vs. 2009 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2009 Subaru Forester is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,457 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Subaru Forester is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Subaru Forester (171 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1955 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Forester should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford 12 M.
Because 2009 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Ford 12 M | 2009 Subaru Forester | |
Make | Ford | Subaru |
Model | 12 M | Forester |
Year Released | 1955 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2457 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 171 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2620 mm |