1955 Ford 12 M vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,792 cc, 2010 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac BLS (247 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 210 more horse power than 1955 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford 12 M.
Because 1955 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Cadillac BLS has automatic transmission and 1955 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1955 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Cadillac BLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Ford 12 M | 2010 Cadillac BLS | |
Make | Ford | Cadillac |
Model | 12 M | BLS |
Year Released | 1955 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2792 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2680 mm |